[Dip]

Yes. The offline network provided in the demo code works perfectly, separating the sounds and localising them. The online is for tamago device, in my demofile. Anyway, changing it to pseye transfer fucntion, didn’t help much with online network version.

I tried out a lot of parameters change and redesigned the network myself with guidelines from cookbook but noise still persists in pseye. I dont know what to do next.

With standard device supported by HARK, I dont think we need to regenerate the transfer function.

I am planning to move onto ROS. Maybe I will get some success in there. I will try out again today with this though.

I’ll update you with my results.

Regards.

[Dip]

Yes. Following the demo pack hark cookbook suggested, I figured that out.

That is really great to know. I could get some help out here. I am a beginner in this field.

I used the demo network from here http://www.hark.jp/networks/HARK_recog_2.3.0.1_practice2.zip , changed it to suit my pseye. It shows sound localization and separation results. But i am still figuring out to interpret those results because in sound localization graph, I get too many lines of graph even though speakers are just two. Plus, the amplitude of separated sound is extremely low. I cannot hear them out properly. Has such problem occur to you? Is there gain or such parameters in it? I couldn’t find.

Anyway, I will be working on it whole week. Will be glad to know your results and get help, if i get stuck somewhere.

Regards.

[Author]

Posts